Showing posts with label government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label government. Show all posts
Monday, 21 January 2013
Friday, 28 December 2012
Talk to frank makes me angry
Was scouring the internet for treatments of cancer for my oncology module for 2013 and stumbled onto a website called "talk to frank" which is a website that supposedly "discusses" the effects of narcotics and is supposed to be there to educate young people on drugs:
its bullshit like this that makes this country ignorant about narcotics:
http://www.talktofrank.com/faq/what-long-term-damage-does-cannabis-cause
here are the truths behind the lies on that one page:
1) cannabis will only increase your likelihood of developing schizophrenia if you're genetically predisposed to it (i.e it runs in your family) other than that, it is actually proven to help protect brain cells, increase their number, and will help you forget adverse memories (such as in PTSD)
2) while yes when you're stoned you can lack motivation, this doesn't last, as soon as the effects wear off your motivation will return, and why is this? because its pure mind set, cannabis will effect you in WHATEVER WAY YOU EXPECT, if you expect to have a bad experience, you will, if you expect it to make you sleepy, it will, if you expect it to just calm you down, relax you and focus your mind, guess what? it'll do that too! Cannabis affects EVERYONE slightly differently, because everyone has a slightly different expectation of the narcotic.
3) this one makes me sick the most - CANNABIS REDUCES THE RISK OF CANCER! and PURE cannabis smoke is actually GOOD for asthma (in a joint, yes, you risk an attack (small risk) from the tobacco smoke, but how many asthmatics smoke normal cigs? my guess is a fair few (a good chunk of my mams family are asthmatic and most of them smoke at LEAST cigs) if you smoked it through a bong/vaporizer the smoke would actually REDUCE your symptoms, as the ecannabinoid system (how many of you knew that the body naturally produces cannabinoids? molecules of the same structure of THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the psychoactive chemical in cannabis) is used to CONTROL INFLAMMATION!
4) the only truth on the whole page, if you're smoking cannabis in a joint, yes there is tobacco, yes tobacco IS bad for you, but the filters in your cigarettes are MUCH worse for you than the tobacco itself (every time you drag on a filter, little bits of glass fiber break off and go into your lungs, causing lacerations, which either scar, or allow more tobacco carcinogens into the lung tissue, when these carcinogens are trapped inside by the healing process, the damage they can cause increases, as the bodies immune response struggles to detect it , causing a "broken glass" appearance on chest x-rays
Not saying everyone should smoke cannabis, but those that want to, providing it doesn't effect anyone, SHOULD be allowed, if someone makes an informed choice to sit in their room surrounded by smoke filling their body with chemicals, why does anyone have a right to stop them, just because its going to take money away from government? We, as a country, let people pump themselves full of alcohol and nicotine legally, and these are 2 of the most harmful drugs known to man, so why not let people add a little bit of goodness to their system?
Aiming to educate on the real effects of Cannabis.
And, for the record, discussing the true effects/risks/legality of cannabis when compared to bullshit government propaganda is my academic and philosophical right, I think its plain wrong that the general public are allowed to be mislead so blatantly.
If cannabis and hemp were to be legalized world over, we'd sort this planet out SO quickly (although, i'd rather just hemp become legalized if that was the only option, we'd still fix the planet, but loads of people would still be taking man made chemicals as medicine which do more harm than good)
Liam
OUT!
its bullshit like this that makes this country ignorant about narcotics:
http://www.talktofrank.com/faq/what-long-term-damage-does-cannabis-cause
here are the truths behind the lies on that one page:
1) cannabis will only increase your likelihood of developing schizophrenia if you're genetically predisposed to it (i.e it runs in your family) other than that, it is actually proven to help protect brain cells, increase their number, and will help you forget adverse memories (such as in PTSD)
2) while yes when you're stoned you can lack motivation, this doesn't last, as soon as the effects wear off your motivation will return, and why is this? because its pure mind set, cannabis will effect you in WHATEVER WAY YOU EXPECT, if you expect to have a bad experience, you will, if you expect it to make you sleepy, it will, if you expect it to just calm you down, relax you and focus your mind, guess what? it'll do that too! Cannabis affects EVERYONE slightly differently, because everyone has a slightly different expectation of the narcotic.
3) this one makes me sick the most - CANNABIS REDUCES THE RISK OF CANCER! and PURE cannabis smoke is actually GOOD for asthma (in a joint, yes, you risk an attack (small risk) from the tobacco smoke, but how many asthmatics smoke normal cigs? my guess is a fair few (a good chunk of my mams family are asthmatic and most of them smoke at LEAST cigs) if you smoked it through a bong/vaporizer the smoke would actually REDUCE your symptoms, as the ecannabinoid system (how many of you knew that the body naturally produces cannabinoids? molecules of the same structure of THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the psychoactive chemical in cannabis) is used to CONTROL INFLAMMATION!
4) the only truth on the whole page, if you're smoking cannabis in a joint, yes there is tobacco, yes tobacco IS bad for you, but the filters in your cigarettes are MUCH worse for you than the tobacco itself (every time you drag on a filter, little bits of glass fiber break off and go into your lungs, causing lacerations, which either scar, or allow more tobacco carcinogens into the lung tissue, when these carcinogens are trapped inside by the healing process, the damage they can cause increases, as the bodies immune response struggles to detect it , causing a "broken glass" appearance on chest x-rays
Not saying everyone should smoke cannabis, but those that want to, providing it doesn't effect anyone, SHOULD be allowed, if someone makes an informed choice to sit in their room surrounded by smoke filling their body with chemicals, why does anyone have a right to stop them, just because its going to take money away from government? We, as a country, let people pump themselves full of alcohol and nicotine legally, and these are 2 of the most harmful drugs known to man, so why not let people add a little bit of goodness to their system?
Aiming to educate on the real effects of Cannabis.
And, for the record, discussing the true effects/risks/legality of cannabis when compared to bullshit government propaganda is my academic and philosophical right, I think its plain wrong that the general public are allowed to be mislead so blatantly.
If cannabis and hemp were to be legalized world over, we'd sort this planet out SO quickly (although, i'd rather just hemp become legalized if that was the only option, we'd still fix the planet, but loads of people would still be taking man made chemicals as medicine which do more harm than good)
Liam
OUT!
Saturday, 3 November 2012
Okay, listen, aliens in the white house? no
There's been a lot of talk about the potential Mick Romney (or whatever he's called, i shall refer to him as devil number 2, because you are voting for one of 2 evils, and Obama is currently in house ) running for the United States presidency, is potentially an alien because; he was born in 1947, and the reported crash in Roswell was in 1947, Also, people are saying that because Roswell is in new Mexico, and DN2 father is from Mexico, this means that he came down in the crash and finally, his supposed beliefs that god lives on another planet.
I will start by addressing the points in the rumor before debunking the theory with the true facts (don't worry, for those who are, more wordly educated, who aren't sheep basically, this is not a "yey government rule" post, don't lose interest just yet)
firstly, the date, is pure coincidence millions of people were born in that year, all over the world, it stands to reason that statistically, one of those millions would at some point run for president.
Secondly, the new mexico, mexico connection, is purely looking for things that COULD be there and jumping to conclusions, there is no social, or physical, direct link between these two areas, if an alien wished to invade and take the country, it wouldn't need to risk having a foreign relative as a father to potentially come under scrutiny, this is just the way devil no. 2s' life panned out for him and he ended up in this power, because of his blood line, his education, his connections, who knows, well, he does, but the questions are avoided
Finally, devil number 2 openly discusses a "god" being on another planet, but this is not a new religious belief, there were people for years who believed the devil watched from below us and god was physically above us observing and waiting for us, and there are videos of all the, alive, old presidents (bar obama) standing in red robes, in front of a great stone owl, towards a flaming pit. This is derived from satanism, so if they believe in the devil below, it makes sense for them to believe in the god above, but maybe they see that someone actually within/on the earth has greater influence than someone above with no means of direct contact?
Now, for my own evidence, all the major governing corporations and banks,are only after one thing, and that, is power,the question is, would the governments really willingly give up control to another being they don't have anything in common with other than desire for power? All the major political members/bankers in the world are all from inbred families, while not to say they're not all related (there's evidence on this, but not compelling) but they're from the sort of families that marry each other to cousins, distant relatives, hell, even close family, to keep the money, power, and more importantly, gold, in the family, they would not happily give up the rights to own the people unless there was something beneficial in their doing so, I hardly think they'd trust a being that had the technology to visit our planet, and then theres the sacred DNA structures they want to keep present, but again, evidence is not fully compelling on this.
As we know the government are liars and corrupt, they will do anything to keep us off the trail of what they truly do, and as more and more people (i believe the term is "waking up") are waking up, they need to find a way to distract those that are looking for the conspiracy, we have to question everything, and do our own research, this is why you can't base everything you know off one source, like a lot of people do, you have to look past potential lies that are their to throw us off the trail, this is a prime "leaked" story to distract us from the real corruption, the people we fight against have been in power for years, they're very clever.
Liam
OUT!
I will start by addressing the points in the rumor before debunking the theory with the true facts (don't worry, for those who are, more wordly educated, who aren't sheep basically, this is not a "yey government rule" post, don't lose interest just yet)
firstly, the date, is pure coincidence millions of people were born in that year, all over the world, it stands to reason that statistically, one of those millions would at some point run for president.
Secondly, the new mexico, mexico connection, is purely looking for things that COULD be there and jumping to conclusions, there is no social, or physical, direct link between these two areas, if an alien wished to invade and take the country, it wouldn't need to risk having a foreign relative as a father to potentially come under scrutiny, this is just the way devil no. 2s' life panned out for him and he ended up in this power, because of his blood line, his education, his connections, who knows, well, he does, but the questions are avoided
Finally, devil number 2 openly discusses a "god" being on another planet, but this is not a new religious belief, there were people for years who believed the devil watched from below us and god was physically above us observing and waiting for us, and there are videos of all the, alive, old presidents (bar obama) standing in red robes, in front of a great stone owl, towards a flaming pit. This is derived from satanism, so if they believe in the devil below, it makes sense for them to believe in the god above, but maybe they see that someone actually within/on the earth has greater influence than someone above with no means of direct contact?
Now, for my own evidence, all the major governing corporations and banks,are only after one thing, and that, is power,the question is, would the governments really willingly give up control to another being they don't have anything in common with other than desire for power? All the major political members/bankers in the world are all from inbred families, while not to say they're not all related (there's evidence on this, but not compelling) but they're from the sort of families that marry each other to cousins, distant relatives, hell, even close family, to keep the money, power, and more importantly, gold, in the family, they would not happily give up the rights to own the people unless there was something beneficial in their doing so, I hardly think they'd trust a being that had the technology to visit our planet, and then theres the sacred DNA structures they want to keep present, but again, evidence is not fully compelling on this.
As we know the government are liars and corrupt, they will do anything to keep us off the trail of what they truly do, and as more and more people (i believe the term is "waking up") are waking up, they need to find a way to distract those that are looking for the conspiracy, we have to question everything, and do our own research, this is why you can't base everything you know off one source, like a lot of people do, you have to look past potential lies that are their to throw us off the trail, this is a prime "leaked" story to distract us from the real corruption, the people we fight against have been in power for years, they're very clever.
Liam
OUT!
Saturday, 27 October 2012
The TRUTH behind banks and money
I spend so much time talking about the banks, yet never really look at the corruption of what people THINK the banks are.
The local branches of banks (barclays, HSBC, Santander etc.) are the people that directly control our money, they see how much we earn, how much we spend, where we spend it, what we spend it on, anyone working at a local branch has access to these details (they have to be, to do there job) and even people over the phone can see your spending habits, hence when you ring up with a blocked card, they ask you questions about your spending.
But, for every pound you have in the bank, this is used as insurance to get loans ten times greater, so 1 pound is worth 10 pounds to the bank, not that special, until you get to big numbers:
If you have 10,000 pounds in your savings, this is worth 100,000 to the banks, they can loan 100,000 out to a bigger company, and when this gets paid back, and the company gets more money, (say, 100,000) this is worth ten times to the bank (so a company with a bottom line of 100,000 each year is worth a whopping 1,000,000 to the banks, this can be lended on and the cycle continues)
HOWEVER, this is not real money, nothing you can touch, its on a screen as a number, so it literally is worthless to us, yet the banks (who control these screens) each digit is worth 10 digits, but in actual paper money, there is not this much money in the world.
If every single person walked into branch and wanted to empty their bank accounts, there wouldn't be enough cash, which is why there is a limit to how much you can withdraw from the bank without notice, you have to ring them and inform them you will be coming to withdraw x number of thousands and they either order the cash in from bigger branches, or request a loan of the government that ask to get more printed by the bank of England (however, the bank of england loans this money to the government at an interest rate, it is then the governments responsibility to pay this debt, but how do they do that? by requesting more money, it is a debt we will never overcome)
so if everyone requested to empty all there savings on the same day, how much paper money would have to be in the world?
lets do the math:
say if (in England) there are 6,000,000 people living with 10,000 in savings in their accounts
that 10,000 is worth 100,000 per person to the banks
so there would have to be 60,000,000,000 (sixty billion) in cash in england at that day, in all the banks, assuming this would be paid in the majority in 50 pound notes there would have to be 1,200,000,000 (one billion two hundred million) notes in circulation. (when realistically the Bank of England say there is only 40 billions worth of all notes in circulation today, there would be 20,000,000,000 pounds missing that would need re printing, quick time )
however, if 6 million people took 10,000 out of there accounts on the same day, the government would lose access to 600,000,000,000 (six hundred billion) in one day, they would be crippled, and the value of the GBP would drop to be less than that of the Japanese yen!
how good does your money seem now?
Liam
OUT!
The local branches of banks (barclays, HSBC, Santander etc.) are the people that directly control our money, they see how much we earn, how much we spend, where we spend it, what we spend it on, anyone working at a local branch has access to these details (they have to be, to do there job) and even people over the phone can see your spending habits, hence when you ring up with a blocked card, they ask you questions about your spending.
But, for every pound you have in the bank, this is used as insurance to get loans ten times greater, so 1 pound is worth 10 pounds to the bank, not that special, until you get to big numbers:
If you have 10,000 pounds in your savings, this is worth 100,000 to the banks, they can loan 100,000 out to a bigger company, and when this gets paid back, and the company gets more money, (say, 100,000) this is worth ten times to the bank (so a company with a bottom line of 100,000 each year is worth a whopping 1,000,000 to the banks, this can be lended on and the cycle continues)
HOWEVER, this is not real money, nothing you can touch, its on a screen as a number, so it literally is worthless to us, yet the banks (who control these screens) each digit is worth 10 digits, but in actual paper money, there is not this much money in the world.
If every single person walked into branch and wanted to empty their bank accounts, there wouldn't be enough cash, which is why there is a limit to how much you can withdraw from the bank without notice, you have to ring them and inform them you will be coming to withdraw x number of thousands and they either order the cash in from bigger branches, or request a loan of the government that ask to get more printed by the bank of England (however, the bank of england loans this money to the government at an interest rate, it is then the governments responsibility to pay this debt, but how do they do that? by requesting more money, it is a debt we will never overcome)
so if everyone requested to empty all there savings on the same day, how much paper money would have to be in the world?
lets do the math:
say if (in England) there are 6,000,000 people living with 10,000 in savings in their accounts
that 10,000 is worth 100,000 per person to the banks
so there would have to be 60,000,000,000 (sixty billion) in cash in england at that day, in all the banks, assuming this would be paid in the majority in 50 pound notes there would have to be 1,200,000,000 (one billion two hundred million) notes in circulation. (when realistically the Bank of England say there is only 40 billions worth of all notes in circulation today, there would be 20,000,000,000 pounds missing that would need re printing, quick time )
however, if 6 million people took 10,000 out of there accounts on the same day, the government would lose access to 600,000,000,000 (six hundred billion) in one day, they would be crippled, and the value of the GBP would drop to be less than that of the Japanese yen!
how good does your money seem now?
Liam
OUT!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)