Found this on facebook, dunno who's running it but they're switched onto the world
Lotta respect
We will fight till you wake up
Wednesday 31 October 2012
GOT A REPLY
So Carlisles' MP got back to me regarding the fluoride levels in the drinking water:
Liam
Starting to make waves, but i have got in touch with United Utilities myself (through use of the freedom of information act) to see if the results i receive collaborate with the results Mr Stevenson passes onto me, should be interesting (letter screen shot below)
But whats most interesting is the fact that this came from the house of commons, this is the first letter i have received from the house of commons, when, normally, back home when I contacted Gordon Prentice about "trivial" local things (trying to organize local activities for youth, requesting lighting on the local basket ball courts etc.) i always received letters from his personal office in Pendle, so that can be taken two ways: 1) Mr Stevenson is a frequent visitor of the house of commons or 2) this has gone higher than any request I've ever made about a local matter (bearing in mind i only asked for a reason behind it, not levels) i REALLY hope its the latter, because it means i'm making bigger waves than i thought... -shrugs- we'll see
letter to United Utilities as promised:
letter to United Utilities as promised:
Lots of people have been questioning my motives behind this, and while yes i DO want fluoridation of drinking water to be removed from the country, really, showing that one 20 year old from such a small low income area with absolutely no political pull what so ever ca make a change, will hopefully persuade people that things CAN be changed just by being strong and standing up for what they believe in, meaning that more people will get off their backsides and start fighting for some real world issues, just in numbers, and in numbers, we will have greater influence!
Liam
OUT!
Tuesday 30 October 2012
just seen my stats...
another big thank you to everyone who reads this and shares it with other people, my stats for october have reached a personal high and it wouldn't have been done without you!
a lot of my views from last month were from America, which is not really somewhere i have a lot of social media following, so i have no idea how you people are finding me, but keep sharing! together, we will get the truth out there
Liam
OUT!
a lot of my views from last month were from America, which is not really somewhere i have a lot of social media following, so i have no idea how you people are finding me, but keep sharing! together, we will get the truth out thereLiam
OUT!
waiting
As many of you will know, i go mad about fluoridation of drinking water,
So i sent this email to my local mp (for American readers mp is a british term for "member of parliament" basically, who we voted into power for our area) : still waiting for a response, i give him 'till friday then i will get in touch again
obviously not going to put my contact details online ;)
Liam
OUT!
So i sent this email to my local mp (for American readers mp is a british term for "member of parliament" basically, who we voted into power for our area) : still waiting for a response, i give him 'till friday then i will get in touch again
 |
| sorry its small haha, looked ugly sticking out the side of my post (click it to see a full screen shot) |
Liam
OUT!
Sunday 28 October 2012
cigarettes filters cause more damage than they prevent!
Ask anyone, smoking causes lung cancer, back when pre rolled cigarettes first came about there was no filter in, you just smoked with tobacco in your mouth, but then the little white filters became standard in all cigarettes, a little white solid tube that you put in the end to filter out some of the harmful chemicals, however, new studies have shown that these filters actually do a different type of damage than the tobacco would, one that could be argued is worse than the tobacco itself:
The filters are made up of something called "glass wool" (kinda like fiberglass, which is known to be bad to inhale) when you take a drag, little bits of this glass break off the filter and go into your lung, these bits of glass tear the soft epithelial cells in the lung, meaning that more of the chemicals the filters are intended to stop, have an easier access to your blood stream, this causes cells to get higher doses of the toxins increasing the likely hood of cancer, however, there is more damage done than this.
As the tears heal, they form scar tissue, which is not as effective at stretching and collapsing as healthy lung tissue, this can lead to COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) emphysema, and then lung cancer, Chest x-rays of chronic smokers have been known to look like those who were exposed to asbestos, giving what is known as a "ground glass" appearance, these white areas are scar tissue, but the continuous damaging and repairing of the tissues leads to lesions developing, and this is where cancer is more likely to develop.
I'm not saying people shouldn't smoke, just that hand rolled with roach or even cotton wool, would be better for you in the long term.
off to watch house now ;)
Liam
OUT!
The filters are made up of something called "glass wool" (kinda like fiberglass, which is known to be bad to inhale) when you take a drag, little bits of this glass break off the filter and go into your lung, these bits of glass tear the soft epithelial cells in the lung, meaning that more of the chemicals the filters are intended to stop, have an easier access to your blood stream, this causes cells to get higher doses of the toxins increasing the likely hood of cancer, however, there is more damage done than this.
As the tears heal, they form scar tissue, which is not as effective at stretching and collapsing as healthy lung tissue, this can lead to COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) emphysema, and then lung cancer, Chest x-rays of chronic smokers have been known to look like those who were exposed to asbestos, giving what is known as a "ground glass" appearance, these white areas are scar tissue, but the continuous damaging and repairing of the tissues leads to lesions developing, and this is where cancer is more likely to develop.
I'm not saying people shouldn't smoke, just that hand rolled with roach or even cotton wool, would be better for you in the long term.
off to watch house now ;)
Liam
OUT!
Saturday 27 October 2012
The TRUTH behind banks and money
I spend so much time talking about the banks, yet never really look at the corruption of what people THINK the banks are.
The local branches of banks (barclays, HSBC, Santander etc.) are the people that directly control our money, they see how much we earn, how much we spend, where we spend it, what we spend it on, anyone working at a local branch has access to these details (they have to be, to do there job) and even people over the phone can see your spending habits, hence when you ring up with a blocked card, they ask you questions about your spending.
But, for every pound you have in the bank, this is used as insurance to get loans ten times greater, so 1 pound is worth 10 pounds to the bank, not that special, until you get to big numbers:
If you have 10,000 pounds in your savings, this is worth 100,000 to the banks, they can loan 100,000 out to a bigger company, and when this gets paid back, and the company gets more money, (say, 100,000) this is worth ten times to the bank (so a company with a bottom line of 100,000 each year is worth a whopping 1,000,000 to the banks, this can be lended on and the cycle continues)
HOWEVER, this is not real money, nothing you can touch, its on a screen as a number, so it literally is worthless to us, yet the banks (who control these screens) each digit is worth 10 digits, but in actual paper money, there is not this much money in the world.
If every single person walked into branch and wanted to empty their bank accounts, there wouldn't be enough cash, which is why there is a limit to how much you can withdraw from the bank without notice, you have to ring them and inform them you will be coming to withdraw x number of thousands and they either order the cash in from bigger branches, or request a loan of the government that ask to get more printed by the bank of England (however, the bank of england loans this money to the government at an interest rate, it is then the governments responsibility to pay this debt, but how do they do that? by requesting more money, it is a debt we will never overcome)
so if everyone requested to empty all there savings on the same day, how much paper money would have to be in the world?
lets do the math:
say if (in England) there are 6,000,000 people living with 10,000 in savings in their accounts
that 10,000 is worth 100,000 per person to the banks
so there would have to be 60,000,000,000 (sixty billion) in cash in england at that day, in all the banks, assuming this would be paid in the majority in 50 pound notes there would have to be 1,200,000,000 (one billion two hundred million) notes in circulation. (when realistically the Bank of England say there is only 40 billions worth of all notes in circulation today, there would be 20,000,000,000 pounds missing that would need re printing, quick time )
however, if 6 million people took 10,000 out of there accounts on the same day, the government would lose access to 600,000,000,000 (six hundred billion) in one day, they would be crippled, and the value of the GBP would drop to be less than that of the Japanese yen!
how good does your money seem now?
Liam
OUT!
The local branches of banks (barclays, HSBC, Santander etc.) are the people that directly control our money, they see how much we earn, how much we spend, where we spend it, what we spend it on, anyone working at a local branch has access to these details (they have to be, to do there job) and even people over the phone can see your spending habits, hence when you ring up with a blocked card, they ask you questions about your spending.
But, for every pound you have in the bank, this is used as insurance to get loans ten times greater, so 1 pound is worth 10 pounds to the bank, not that special, until you get to big numbers:
If you have 10,000 pounds in your savings, this is worth 100,000 to the banks, they can loan 100,000 out to a bigger company, and when this gets paid back, and the company gets more money, (say, 100,000) this is worth ten times to the bank (so a company with a bottom line of 100,000 each year is worth a whopping 1,000,000 to the banks, this can be lended on and the cycle continues)
HOWEVER, this is not real money, nothing you can touch, its on a screen as a number, so it literally is worthless to us, yet the banks (who control these screens) each digit is worth 10 digits, but in actual paper money, there is not this much money in the world.
If every single person walked into branch and wanted to empty their bank accounts, there wouldn't be enough cash, which is why there is a limit to how much you can withdraw from the bank without notice, you have to ring them and inform them you will be coming to withdraw x number of thousands and they either order the cash in from bigger branches, or request a loan of the government that ask to get more printed by the bank of England (however, the bank of england loans this money to the government at an interest rate, it is then the governments responsibility to pay this debt, but how do they do that? by requesting more money, it is a debt we will never overcome)
so if everyone requested to empty all there savings on the same day, how much paper money would have to be in the world?
lets do the math:
say if (in England) there are 6,000,000 people living with 10,000 in savings in their accounts
that 10,000 is worth 100,000 per person to the banks
so there would have to be 60,000,000,000 (sixty billion) in cash in england at that day, in all the banks, assuming this would be paid in the majority in 50 pound notes there would have to be 1,200,000,000 (one billion two hundred million) notes in circulation. (when realistically the Bank of England say there is only 40 billions worth of all notes in circulation today, there would be 20,000,000,000 pounds missing that would need re printing, quick time )
however, if 6 million people took 10,000 out of there accounts on the same day, the government would lose access to 600,000,000,000 (six hundred billion) in one day, they would be crippled, and the value of the GBP would drop to be less than that of the Japanese yen!
how good does your money seem now?
Liam
OUT!
Blogger views
My blogger views have been increasing loads and have reach 307 views this month
Share the posts that interest you/ you think the world should know about and we'll slowly start waking up the population.
Thanks all
Liam
Share the posts that interest you/ you think the world should know about and we'll slowly start waking up the population.
Thanks all
Liam
Wednesday 24 October 2012
whoops
So last post was 17 days ago, need something to talk about.... errrmmm HEALTH CARE!
As many of you will know I go off on placements to practice radiography at a hospital, so a lot of what i will say in this post I have seen first hand for myself and it disgusts me!
The health care system (in Britain where it is free, and i assume its worse in America where everyone needs either insurance or to pay for their own treatment) is disgusting, we're convinced that the whole system is there to help us get better, which it is, to a certain extent.
HOWEVER! At a certain age you become no longer "worth" dealing with, because you're not going to be alive long enough for the government (who own the health care system in the uk) to be able to tax you for the treatment (despite the fact that anyone earning a legitimate wage in the uk has to pay taxes and national insurance on it without the choice for their entire life, you'd think that by the time you were in your 80's you'd have paid enough for them to give whatever treatment you needed) so they don't treat, and you get told you're "high risk" and left to it on your own, just a few examples of this that I have seen are:
89 year old woman - fractured neck of femur (part of your femur just below the hip joint for those that don't know) unable to have an operation to fixate the hip/ give a new hip because the general anesthetic is too risky for them and they might not wake up, fair enough, however, they can do that procedure under LOCAL anesthetic, minimal risk to the patients life, and she might have been able to be able to walk around for a good number of years before death, instead, it was pulled and prodded to reduce long term pain and she was sent home to be wheel chair bound for the rest of her life
80 year old man (this was just yesterday!) already a lung cancer sufferer that had refused treatment for the cancer, however he had come in and the x-rays showed he had a collapsed lung, very collapsed, (almost half his lung hand collapsed down in on itself) anyone young enough would have been admitted and attempts to re inflate the lung would be made, if this was not possible a chemical can be injected into the collapsed lung forming scare tissue which benefits the patients breathing in the long term, giving them a better quality of life, guess what happened to him? SENT HOME! bed bound, with time he may recover enough to be able to get up and about, but will suffer shortness of breath and very labored breathing for the rest of his life
Now, so many of you won't see and issue with this, because you'll believe the crap we're fed "old people won't recover anyway" "too risky" blah blah, but just think, when you're 80+ plus and shatter your hip, would you want treatment? I think you would!
Next is the fact that many cancer patients deteriorate very quickly AFTER they've been diagnosed with cancer, even if that cancer has been there for years and has only just been discovered, why? BECAUSE HEALTH PROFESSIONALS PUMP THEM FULL OF TOXINS! We've all heard of chemotherapy, but how many of us actually know what it means? well, breaking down the word its very obvious: chemo: chemicals therapy: well... therapy, so its therapy with chemicals, but what are these chemicals designed to do? KILL CELLS! and as a living organism your body is FULL of cells, chemo doesn't differentiate, it only kills cancer off more quickly because tumors have a greater blood use because they're growing more rapidly, imagine a cancer patient in your mind, they do not look healthy, however, most of the time they only get checked because (for example, lung cancer) they have had a cough for a while, or they found a lump, and thats there ONLY symptom, now, i'm not saying that cancer won't kill you, it will, eventually, but the drugs they use to TREAT it will kill you a damn site faster, yet, the body has its own cancer fighting abilities, which is why theres a load of "anti cancer" diets about nower days, most of them are considered to go no where because why would the health service (who make money off treating you, but more on this later) want to stop some of there longest standing patients from coming to hospital? If you want to fight cancer naturally, the best way is to cleanse and stimulate your pineal gland, which secretes melatonin, which has been linked to the body rejecting and destroying cancer cells (feel free to do some of your own research on this, its out there)
Now, as mentioned earlier, the NHS makes money off treating you, well, not the NHS as such, but the employees of the NHS, anyone that pulls a wage obviously benefits from you going into your doctors/hospital etc.
I'm not at all sure of all costs, but, a chest x-ray is charged to the government at around about £50 per exposure, this is to cover the radiographers wages, the electricity used, and the general upkeep of the machine (which doesn't take much, they get checked maybe once a week, by the radiographers and then every couple of years by a technician providing nothing goes wrong) and you're in the x-ray room for all of 3 minutes to take a chest x-ray, on average.
Each day, i alone, as a student, probably do an average of about 10-15 chest x-rays a day, so that's 500 for about half an hours work, and we receive about 8000 a year in bursaries and expenses, and spend 27 weeks a year working in the hospital, 5 days a week, so that's a profit of about £59000 just off 1 student doing just 10 chest x-rays a day, and theres 22 students on my course, making the profits £1,298,000 of one year of one university ALONE (obviously theres a bit more maths to that but thats just a rough estimate)
And we don't pay a penny directly for it! but it all comes out of our taxes!
We have one of the best health care systems in the world, but there's a lot of corruption and politics behind it
liam
OUT!
As many of you will know I go off on placements to practice radiography at a hospital, so a lot of what i will say in this post I have seen first hand for myself and it disgusts me!
The health care system (in Britain where it is free, and i assume its worse in America where everyone needs either insurance or to pay for their own treatment) is disgusting, we're convinced that the whole system is there to help us get better, which it is, to a certain extent.
HOWEVER! At a certain age you become no longer "worth" dealing with, because you're not going to be alive long enough for the government (who own the health care system in the uk) to be able to tax you for the treatment (despite the fact that anyone earning a legitimate wage in the uk has to pay taxes and national insurance on it without the choice for their entire life, you'd think that by the time you were in your 80's you'd have paid enough for them to give whatever treatment you needed) so they don't treat, and you get told you're "high risk" and left to it on your own, just a few examples of this that I have seen are:
89 year old woman - fractured neck of femur (part of your femur just below the hip joint for those that don't know) unable to have an operation to fixate the hip/ give a new hip because the general anesthetic is too risky for them and they might not wake up, fair enough, however, they can do that procedure under LOCAL anesthetic, minimal risk to the patients life, and she might have been able to be able to walk around for a good number of years before death, instead, it was pulled and prodded to reduce long term pain and she was sent home to be wheel chair bound for the rest of her life
80 year old man (this was just yesterday!) already a lung cancer sufferer that had refused treatment for the cancer, however he had come in and the x-rays showed he had a collapsed lung, very collapsed, (almost half his lung hand collapsed down in on itself) anyone young enough would have been admitted and attempts to re inflate the lung would be made, if this was not possible a chemical can be injected into the collapsed lung forming scare tissue which benefits the patients breathing in the long term, giving them a better quality of life, guess what happened to him? SENT HOME! bed bound, with time he may recover enough to be able to get up and about, but will suffer shortness of breath and very labored breathing for the rest of his life
Now, so many of you won't see and issue with this, because you'll believe the crap we're fed "old people won't recover anyway" "too risky" blah blah, but just think, when you're 80+ plus and shatter your hip, would you want treatment? I think you would!
Next is the fact that many cancer patients deteriorate very quickly AFTER they've been diagnosed with cancer, even if that cancer has been there for years and has only just been discovered, why? BECAUSE HEALTH PROFESSIONALS PUMP THEM FULL OF TOXINS! We've all heard of chemotherapy, but how many of us actually know what it means? well, breaking down the word its very obvious: chemo: chemicals therapy: well... therapy, so its therapy with chemicals, but what are these chemicals designed to do? KILL CELLS! and as a living organism your body is FULL of cells, chemo doesn't differentiate, it only kills cancer off more quickly because tumors have a greater blood use because they're growing more rapidly, imagine a cancer patient in your mind, they do not look healthy, however, most of the time they only get checked because (for example, lung cancer) they have had a cough for a while, or they found a lump, and thats there ONLY symptom, now, i'm not saying that cancer won't kill you, it will, eventually, but the drugs they use to TREAT it will kill you a damn site faster, yet, the body has its own cancer fighting abilities, which is why theres a load of "anti cancer" diets about nower days, most of them are considered to go no where because why would the health service (who make money off treating you, but more on this later) want to stop some of there longest standing patients from coming to hospital? If you want to fight cancer naturally, the best way is to cleanse and stimulate your pineal gland, which secretes melatonin, which has been linked to the body rejecting and destroying cancer cells (feel free to do some of your own research on this, its out there)
Now, as mentioned earlier, the NHS makes money off treating you, well, not the NHS as such, but the employees of the NHS, anyone that pulls a wage obviously benefits from you going into your doctors/hospital etc.
I'm not at all sure of all costs, but, a chest x-ray is charged to the government at around about £50 per exposure, this is to cover the radiographers wages, the electricity used, and the general upkeep of the machine (which doesn't take much, they get checked maybe once a week, by the radiographers and then every couple of years by a technician providing nothing goes wrong) and you're in the x-ray room for all of 3 minutes to take a chest x-ray, on average.
Each day, i alone, as a student, probably do an average of about 10-15 chest x-rays a day, so that's 500 for about half an hours work, and we receive about 8000 a year in bursaries and expenses, and spend 27 weeks a year working in the hospital, 5 days a week, so that's a profit of about £59000 just off 1 student doing just 10 chest x-rays a day, and theres 22 students on my course, making the profits £1,298,000 of one year of one university ALONE (obviously theres a bit more maths to that but thats just a rough estimate)
And we don't pay a penny directly for it! but it all comes out of our taxes!
We have one of the best health care systems in the world, but there's a lot of corruption and politics behind it
liam
OUT!
Sunday 7 October 2012
Time is false
Ask a child, we
have 12 hours of day, 12 hours of night, and that makes sense if you
look at the standard 12-12 clock, say sunset is about 7 pm that means
sunrise is about 7 am, and this is pretty constant, given a few hours
differences at key times (we're near the top of the earth so get less
sunlight than in summer due to the earths axis)
but the actual order of time is very different, sticking with the average clock and based on "government recommended" sleep patterns we can see we have more "hours" in the day that first given to us.
We start our day at work at about 9 am, or 0900 hours, we will call this time 00:00
then as each hour progresses we add another hour to 00:00, but assuming an average 8 hour working day:
0900 - 0000 < work day starts
1000- 0100
1100 - 0200
1200 - 0300
1300 - 0400
1400 - 0500
1500 - 0600
1600- 0700
1700 - 0800 < work day finishes
1800- 0900
1900 - 1000
2000 - 1100
2100 - 1200
2200 - 1300
2300 - 1400 < most lights are out by now
0000 - 1500
0100 - 1600
0200 - 1700
0300 - 1800
0400 - 1900
0500 - 2000
0600 - 2100
0700 - 2200 < people start to wake up here
0800 - 2300
0900 - 0000
As i have mentioned before in great detail here, we only need 3 hours sleep a night, so we lose 5 hours to pointless sleep making us zombifide
we have 4 bonus hours each day that aren't considered "useful" as they're "down time" from the days work, and we spend this time where? sat in front of the TV getting brain washed, how many times have you gone to bed thinking "well, that was a waste of a day" or "i really wish i'd done task x"? this is because we spend all our time staring at a box, This box is filling your head with ideas and you're not even remembering them, you're loosing that time to the tv,
we're all being brain washed and conditioned to think the way THEY want, even down to the simple adverts that are shown on tv are bombarding our senses with ideas and messages that sit in our subconscious and loiter, this has been proven and used in the media before.
First example:
the macdonalds cartoons in England with the hamburgerler and his friends, these used to flash up Marlborough cigarette packets up on screens, not aimed at the kids, but the adults subconscious, getting them to smoke, explaining why a lot of elders smoke, however, as kids brains were like sponges, they also absorbed the message, however, the law stopped them from smoking for many years, but at high school, a lot, if not most, people try smoking, because they were bombarded with these images as children! thats why the smoking ages has moved constantly with the 1989-1992 generation, to try and control the smoking messages that were implanted by restricting access, this was a contingency plan they CLEARLY decided upon at the time of showing the cartoons, now think back to those shows, they hardly seem memorable, because they are brainwashed out of you as soon as the damage is done, scary isn't it!
Second example:
it was well known that adverts used to use subliminal messages to sell their products, however, this was made illegal recently, but it doesn't mean its been stopped, just that they got more sly and influencing...
Also, in the George bush campaign (i want to say against al gore, but i'm not 100% sure) there was a subliminal message from bush's party, in a party political broadcast (or equivalent in America) where bushes party was outlining gores (assumption, correct me if i'm wrong please. these things are easily re-searchable) and the word "RATS" flashed up, just a frame to quickly for it to be seen running full speed (but your subconscious still saw it, your brain just didn't register it process worthy, but it still had to detect it to decide that, planting the message) this was found by people slowing down the real time recordings by a few frames per second, this shows how sloppy bushes party were at assassinating their opponents policies, they knew they were going to win because the Rothschild were going to make it so, because this kept them in power and with control of effectively the world.
haha, post about robbing time, flowed into brainwashing, then onto political corruption and the controllers of the world.
who says i don't have a brain :P
even if its wrong haha
Liam
OUT1
but the actual order of time is very different, sticking with the average clock and based on "government recommended" sleep patterns we can see we have more "hours" in the day that first given to us.
We start our day at work at about 9 am, or 0900 hours, we will call this time 00:00
then as each hour progresses we add another hour to 00:00, but assuming an average 8 hour working day:
0900 - 0000 < work day starts
1000- 0100
1100 - 0200
1200 - 0300
1300 - 0400
1400 - 0500
1500 - 0600
1600- 0700
1700 - 0800 < work day finishes
1800- 0900
1900 - 1000
2000 - 1100
2100 - 1200
2200 - 1300
2300 - 1400 < most lights are out by now
0000 - 1500
0100 - 1600
0200 - 1700
0300 - 1800
0400 - 1900
0500 - 2000
0600 - 2100
0700 - 2200 < people start to wake up here
0800 - 2300
0900 - 0000
As i have mentioned before in great detail here, we only need 3 hours sleep a night, so we lose 5 hours to pointless sleep making us zombifide
we have 4 bonus hours each day that aren't considered "useful" as they're "down time" from the days work, and we spend this time where? sat in front of the TV getting brain washed, how many times have you gone to bed thinking "well, that was a waste of a day" or "i really wish i'd done task x"? this is because we spend all our time staring at a box, This box is filling your head with ideas and you're not even remembering them, you're loosing that time to the tv,
we're all being brain washed and conditioned to think the way THEY want, even down to the simple adverts that are shown on tv are bombarding our senses with ideas and messages that sit in our subconscious and loiter, this has been proven and used in the media before.
First example:
the macdonalds cartoons in England with the hamburgerler and his friends, these used to flash up Marlborough cigarette packets up on screens, not aimed at the kids, but the adults subconscious, getting them to smoke, explaining why a lot of elders smoke, however, as kids brains were like sponges, they also absorbed the message, however, the law stopped them from smoking for many years, but at high school, a lot, if not most, people try smoking, because they were bombarded with these images as children! thats why the smoking ages has moved constantly with the 1989-1992 generation, to try and control the smoking messages that were implanted by restricting access, this was a contingency plan they CLEARLY decided upon at the time of showing the cartoons, now think back to those shows, they hardly seem memorable, because they are brainwashed out of you as soon as the damage is done, scary isn't it!
Second example:
it was well known that adverts used to use subliminal messages to sell their products, however, this was made illegal recently, but it doesn't mean its been stopped, just that they got more sly and influencing...
Also, in the George bush campaign (i want to say against al gore, but i'm not 100% sure) there was a subliminal message from bush's party, in a party political broadcast (or equivalent in America) where bushes party was outlining gores (assumption, correct me if i'm wrong please. these things are easily re-searchable) and the word "RATS" flashed up, just a frame to quickly for it to be seen running full speed (but your subconscious still saw it, your brain just didn't register it process worthy, but it still had to detect it to decide that, planting the message) this was found by people slowing down the real time recordings by a few frames per second, this shows how sloppy bushes party were at assassinating their opponents policies, they knew they were going to win because the Rothschild were going to make it so, because this kept them in power and with control of effectively the world.
haha, post about robbing time, flowed into brainwashing, then onto political corruption and the controllers of the world.
who says i don't have a brain :P
even if its wrong haha
Liam
OUT1
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)